on Wed Oct 01, '03 12:58 PM from the darl-knows-bad-letters-when-he-sees-them dept.
ComaVN writes "Not a big surprise for those
who have followed the recent
SCO misery, but SCO is going after SGI. According to SGI, SCO intends to terminate their Unix System V
license, much like they did with IBM earlier.
I guess it's hard to stop once you've chosen a certain direction for your company."sheddd writes "Does this case have any merit? Joe
Formage has written a good article on SCO's strange behavior." Read on below for SCO's odd tactic of attacking the GPL by belittling IBM's legal diligence in not avoiding GPL'd software, and word on why Linux users aren't being served SCO invoices.
From the letter: 'SCO believes that the GPL --
created by the Free Software Foundation to supplant current U.S. copyright
laws -- is a shaky foundation on which to build a legal case.'" The release is also carried by NewsForge. Among other things,
SCO says "By so strongly defending the controversial GPL, IBM is also defending a questionable licensing scheme through which it can avoid providing software indemnification for its customers."
And if you're wondering why you have not received an invoice from SCO for any Linux-based OS you may be running, benploni writes "From Groklaw: In this Detroit News story Blake Stowell explains why no one has
received an invoice: 'SCO in August said Linux users could avoid lawsuits by paying a one-time fee of $699. The fee will rise to $1,399 on Oct.
15. Since the response to its appeal was adequate, SCO didn't send bills to thousands of Linux users, company spokesman Blake Stowell
said.'[emphasis added]. We all knew there was no way they'd risk actually sending out invoices, and here's the proof."