OSTG | SourceForgeThinkGeekIT Product GuideLinux.comNewsForgefreshmeatNewslettersTechJobsSlashdot Broadband X 
Welcome to Slashdot
 Login
 Why Login?
 Why Subscribe?

 Sections
 Main
 Apache
 Apple
 AskSlashdot
  7 more
 Books
 BSD
 Developers
  1 more
 Games
  7 more
 Interviews
 IT
 Linux
  4 more
 Politics
 Science
  2 more
 YRO
 
 Help
 FAQ
 Bugs

 Stories
 Old Stories
 Old Polls
 Topics
 Hall of Fame
 Submit Story

 About
 Supporters
 Code
 Awards

 Services
 Broadband
 PriceGrabber
 Product Guide
 Special Offers
 Tech Jobs
 IT Research

SGI Code Changes Not Enough, Says SCO
Caldera
Silicon Graphics
Unix
Posted by timothy on Sat Oct 04, '03 02:58 PM
from the no-mr-bond-I-expect-you-to-buy-licenses dept.
yeremein writes "According to this vnunet.com article, SCO's code changes Update: 10/04 20:51 GMT by T: (This should read "SGI's" rather than "SCO's.") removing arguably System-V-related code from SGI's Linux submissions is 'not enough.' According to Blake Stowell of SCO, 'Making minor amendments to its XFS file system doesn't cure the breach. SGI must do more as outlined [in the August letter] to cure all of their breaches.' But later on in the article, we learn what was outlined in the August letter: 'We don't believe that SGI has taken all of the steps necessary to cure all of the breaches, and in fact in our letter to them, we state "SGI's breaches of these agreements cannot be cured."' So SCO essentially told SGI, 'You're in violation of our contract and unless you remedy the violations, we'll pull your UNIX license. Oh, BTW, you can't remedy the violations.' This looks to me like the clearest example yet of how SCO is acting in bad faith." Read on below for another snippet of SCO strangeness.

An anonymous reader writes "As many are aware, SCO has sought (and got) a 4 month extension to its IBM lawsuit. According to the Salt Lake Tribune: 'SCO spokesman Blake Stowell said Tuesday that he understood the extension is being sought "for the purpose of gaining documents from IBM related to the patents they claim. . . . Some of the patents aren't even filed with the U.S. Patent Office, as far as we can learn."' I thought this was worth looking at, and quickly found that the patents in question are 4,814,746, 4,821,211, 4,953,209, and 5,805,785 - which can be found by typing in their numbers in this USPTO form."

 

 
Slashdot Log In
Nickname:

Password:

Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· Compare the best prices on: Software/Operating Systems
· According to the Salt Lake Tribune
· 4,814,746, 4,821,211, 4,953,209, and 5,805,785
· this USPTO form
· yeremein
· this vnunet.com article
· code changes
· T
· More Caldera stories
· Also by timothy
 
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
SGI Code Changes Not Enough, Says SCO | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 399 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 
  I enjoy the time that we spend together.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2004 OSTG.
[ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSTG | advertise | about | terms of service | privacy | faq | rss ]