OSTG | SourceForgeThinkGeekIT Product GuideLinux.comNewsForgefreshmeatNewslettersTechJobsSlashdot Broadband X 
Welcome to Slashdot
 Why Login?
 Why Subscribe?

  7 more
  1 more
  7 more
  4 more
  2 more

 Old Stories
 Old Polls
 Hall of Fame
 Submit Story


 Product Guide
 Special Offers
 Tech Jobs
 IT Research

SCO Madness Reigns Supreme
Posted by timothy on Wed Oct 29, '03 03:24 PM
from the world's-funniest-joke dept.
Sri Lumpa writes "It will come as little surprise for those of you that followed the SCO stories and read their latest filing that an IP attorney, Douglas Steele, Esq., thinks that 'SCO is trying to get the judge to declare all works released under the GPL for the last 3 years put into the public domain.' Meanwhile, more lawyers give their opinions, with Eben Moglen saying 'It's just rubbish,' while another says of SCO's defense: 'From the outside, it appears so bizarre and so ridiculous that I fear their argument is being misstated,' while Blake Stowell of SCO believes Congress has drawn a boundary between proprietary and open source and still insists that IBM should indemnify its Linux users while refusing to indemnify SCO's Samba users against a potential MS lawsuit. More links to related news stories continue to appear in the comment section of the first link, thanks to the Groklaw readers." Read on for another handful of updates in SCO vs. The World.

Roblimo knows good, honest Constitutional argumentation when he sees it, and over on NewsForge amplifies SCO's claims that the GPL is unconstitutional.

Dopey Panda writes "Looks like SCO has become just a bit worried about their liabilities for distributing the Linux kernel. Starting November 1 you will have to be a registered SCO customer to be able to access their FTP site. So that leaves just a couple days for you to download your own genuine SCO-approved GPL code!"

And perhaps today's most interesting SCO submission: 1HandClapping writes "In alwayson-network.com, Mark F. Radcliffe (HIAL) writes about a little-reported aspect of the SCO vs IBM case: 'Novell, as part of its sale of the UNIX licenses to SCO, retained the right to require SCO to "amend, supplement, modify or waive any right" under the license agreements (and if SCO did not comply, Novell could exercise those rights itself on SCO's behalf). At IBM's request, Novell employed this right and demanded that SCO waive IBM's purported violations. When SCO did not do so, Novell exercised its right to waive the violations on SCO's behalf. Basically, this defense destroys the core of the SCO case: IBM's violation of its UNIX license with SCO.'"


Slashdot Log In


Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· Compare the best prices on: Software/Operating Systems
· the GPL is unconstitutional
· FTP site
· genuine SCO-approved GPL code
· little-reported aspect of the SCO vs IBM case
· latest filing
· put into the public domain
· give their opinions
· bizarre and so ridiculous
· boundary between proprietary and open source
· while refusing to indemnify SCO's Samba users
· More Caldera stories
· Also by timothy
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
SCO Madness Reigns Supreme | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 607 comments | Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  I enjoy the time that we spend together.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2004 OSTG.
[ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSTG | advertise | about | terms of service | privacy | faq | rss ]