OSTG | SourceForgeThinkGeekIT Product GuideLinux.comNewsForgefreshmeatNewslettersTechJobsSlashdot Broadband X 
Welcome to Slashdot
 Login
 Why Login?
 Why Subscribe?

 Sections
 Main
 Apache
 Apple
 AskSlashdot
  7 more
 Books
 BSD
 Developers
  1 more
 Games
  7 more
 Interviews
 IT
 Linux
  4 more
 Politics
 Science
  2 more
 YRO
 
 Help
 FAQ
 Bugs

 Stories
 Old Stories
 Old Polls
 Topics
 Hall of Fame
 Submit Story

 About
 Supporters
 Code
 Awards

 Services
 Broadband
 PriceGrabber
 Product Guide
 Special Offers
 Tech Jobs
 IT Research

SCO Says 'Linux Doesn't Exist'
Caldera
IBM
The Courts
Linux
Posted by michael on Thu Aug 26, '04 10:39 AM
from the news-to-us dept.
4A6F656C writes "In an article on LinuxWorld.com.au, Kieren O'Shaughnessy, director of SCO Australia and New Zealand, details SCO's plans for Australia, stating that they have 'prepared a hit list' and "would approach Australian Linux users to ensure they had an IP licence." In closing, he adds 'Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix'." UnknowingFool writes "IBM's lawyers have been busy the last few days. Groklaw has reported a number of different filings. On the heels of last week's motions (1) and (2) for summary judgement, they have filed more documents. First, IBM wants large portions of SCO's testimonies striken (removed) on multiple grounds. Deep in the motion, they call out SCO to produce the 'experts' that did the code comparison analysis. If IBM wins on most of these points, SCO will have very little left in the way of legal evidence. SCO answers on IBMs 10th counterclaim. IANAL but from I understand SCO says this copyright infringment that SCO has allegedly committed on one of IBM's patents is irrelevant to the case and the court doesn't need to decide on it. So SCO is saying that they can sue IBM for infringing on their Unix copyrights and patents but IBM can't counter sue on a specific patent. IBM also filed another memo to support summary judgement. As a matter of law, SCO has to produce evidence to backup its claims. This mountain of evidence SCO has claimed all this time: If they don't produce it, the court has to rule in IBM's favor."

 

 
Slashdot Log In
Nickname:

Password:

Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· article
· (1)
· (2)
· IBM wants large portions of SCO's testimonies striken (removed)
· SCO answers on IBMs 10th counterclaim.
· IBM also filed another memo to support summary judgement
· More stories
· Also by michael
 
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
SCO Says 'Linux Doesn't Exist' | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 739 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 
  I enjoy the time that we spend together.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2004 OSTG.
[ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSTG | advertise | about | terms of service | privacy | faq | rss ]